HQ 112205

VES-3-14-CO:R:IT:C  112205 LLB

CATEGORY:  Carriers

Mr. Henry Tomingas

Ocean Explorers

P.O. Box 111321

Anchorage, Alaska 99511

RE:  Coastwise transportation; Merchandise; Passengers;

     Oceanographic research; 46 U.S.C. App. 289 and 883

Dear Mr. Tomingas;

     Reference is made to your facsimile transmission of April

13, 1992, in which you request that we rule upon the use of a

vessel in territorial waters for the purpose of conducting

oceanographic research activities.

FACTS:

     It is proposed that the vessel BERING EXPLORER, which

apparently bears a State registration number and which is of

unknown qualification under the terms of the coastwise laws, be

utilized to conduct oceanographic research activities on the

Yukon River in Alaska.  It is stated that the mission of the

vessel will involve mapping and survey operations.

ISSUE:

     Whether oceanographic research in the form of survey and

mapping operations conducted within the territorial waters of the

United States is considered an engagement in the coastwise trade.

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

     The Act of June 19, 1886, as amended (24 Stat. 81; 46 U.S.C.

App.   289, sometimes called the coastwise passenger law),

provides that:

          No foreign vessel shall transport passengers

          between ports or places in the United States

          either directly or by way of a foreign port,

          under a penalty of $200 for each passenger so

          transported and landed. 

     For your general information, we have consistently

interpreted this prohibition to apply to all vessels except

United States-built, owned, and properly documented vessels (see

46 U.S.C.  12106, 12110, 46 U.S.C. App.  883, and 19 C.F.R.  

4.80).  Further, a passenger is defined as “…any person carried

on a vessel who is not connected with the operation of such

vessel, her navigation, ownership, or business.”  (See section

4.50(b), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 4.50(b)).

     The coastwise law pertaining to the transportation of

merchandise, section 27 of the Act of June 5, 1920, as amended

(41 Stat. 999; 46 U.S.C. App. 883, often called the Jones Act),

provides that:

          No merchandise shall be transported by water,

          or by land and water, on penalty of forfeiture

          of the merchandise (or a monetary amount up to

          the value thereof as determined by the Secretary

          of the Treasury, or the actual cost of the trans-

          portation, whichever is greater, to be recovered

          from any consignor, seller, owner, importer,

          consignee, agent, or other person or persons

          so transporting or causing said merchandise to be

          transported), between points in the United

          States…embraced within the coastwise laws,           

either directly or via a foreign port, or for

          any part of the transportation, in any other           

vessel than a vessel built in and documented

          under the laws of the United States and owned

          by persons who are citizens of the United         

States… 

     The coastwise laws generally apply to points in the

territorial sea, defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide,

seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in

the internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline, in

cases where the baseline and the coastline differ.  These laws

have also been interpreted to apply to transportation between

points within a single harbor.  Merchandise, as used in section

883, includes any article, including even materials of no value

(see the amendment to section 883 by the Act of June 7, 1988,

Pub. L. 100-329; 102 Stat. 588).

     The Customs Service has long held that the use of a vessel

solely in the conduct of oceanographic research is not a use in

the coastwise trade.  Accordingly, the use of a non-coastwise-

qualified vessel to conduct oceanographic research in the form of

survey and mapping operations within territorial waters,

including the transportation of persons and equipment/materials

necessary to complete that mission is not violative of the

coastwise laws (Ruling Letter 109344, July 6, 1988).

HOLDING:

     A non-coastwise-qualified vessel may be used within the

territorial waters of the United States for purely oceanographic

research purposes without violating the coastwise laws.

                              Sincerely,

                              B. James Fritz

                              Chief

Stay Informed on Jones Act Rulings

Get expert insights and updates on key Jones Act rulings. Subscribe now to ensure compliance and stay ahead.

Table of Contents